Holding Manufacturers Accountable for Defective Products

At Schneiderman Trial Attorneys, we understand that consumers place their trust in manufacturers every day. When defective products cause serious injuries, our dedicated product liability attorneys fight to hold corporations accountable. Our firm combines technical expertise with aggressive advocacy to secure the compensation California consumers deserve when they’re harmed by dangerous products.

Free Product Liability Evaluation | No Recovery, No Fee | Technical & Legal Expertise

At Schneiderman Trial Attorneys, we fight to ensure those responsible are held accountable and that you receive the compensation you deserve.
Product Liability Practice

California’s product liability laws provide strong protections for consumers injured by defective products. Under California’s strict liability standard, manufacturers and sellers can be held responsible for injuries caused by their products without the injured party having to prove negligence. This consumer-friendly legal framework creates powerful opportunities for recovery, but requires sophisticated legal representation to navigate effectively.

Schneiderman Trial Attorneys handles product liability cases involving all types of defects:

Design Defects

Design defects occur when a product’s fundamental design renders it unreasonably dangerous, even when manufactured correctly and used as intended. California applies the “consumer expectation test” and the “risk-benefit test” to evaluate design defect claims.

Our firm represents clients injured by design defects including:

  • Vehicles with inherent stability problems causing rollovers
  • Medical devices with fundamentally flawed designs
  • Pharmaceuticals with formulation issues causing unintended side effects
  • Children’s products with choking hazards or unsafe features
  • Industrial equipment lacking proper safety guards or mechanisms
  • Consumer electronics with fire or shock hazards due to design flaws
  • Recreational equipment designed without adequate safety features
  • Machinery with inadequate emergency stop mechanisms
  • Tools lacking proper safety shields or guards
  • Household appliances with inherently dangerous features
  • Building products that fail under normal conditions
  • Safety equipment that fails to provide claimed protection

We work with engineering experts, industrial designers, and safety specialists to analyze product designs and identify specific flaws. Our technical approach includes computer modeling, prototype testing, and failure analysis to demonstrate how alternative designs would have prevented injuries. We understand the complex interplay between applicable industry standards, governmental regulations, and design best practices.

For medical device and pharmaceutical cases, we collaborate with specialized experts in biomechanics, pharmacology, and medical research to establish how design flaws led to injuries. We analyze FDA approval processes, clinical trial data, and post-market surveillance reports to build comprehensive cases against powerful pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers.

Manufacturing defects occur when a product deviates from its intended design during production, creating dangerous conditions in specific units or batches. These cases often involve proving that a specific product differed from design specifications or other units in the same product line.

Our manufacturing defect expertise includes cases involving:

  • Contaminated food products causing illness or injury
  • Pharmaceuticals with improper ingredient ratios or contaminants
  • Automotive components that fail due to improper materials or assembly
  • Consumer products with substandard materials or construction
  • Medical devices with manufacturing irregularities
  • Electronics with internal wiring or component defects
  • Children’s products with parts that detach or break unexpectedly
  • Building materials failing below rated specifications
  • Safety equipment compromised during manufacturing
  • Mechanical systems with improperly assembled components
  • Products with missing safety features or components
  • Metal products with metallurgical flaws or improper heat treatment

Our approach to manufacturing defect cases includes detailed forensic analysis of the specific product that caused injury, often comparing it to properly manufactured examples of the same product. We work with metallurgists, industrial engineers, quality control experts, and testing laboratories to scientifically document manufacturing deviations.

We understand how to obtain and analyze internal manufacturing records, quality control data, and supplier information through the discovery process. For cases involving systematic manufacturing problems, we investigate similar incidents and complaints, sometimes collaborating with attorneys handling similar cases nationwide to establish patterns of defects.

Even properly designed and manufactured products can be defective if they lack adequate warnings about non-obvious dangers or proper instructions for safe use. California law imposes a duty on manufacturers to warn consumers about potential hazards associated with their products.

We handle failure to warn cases involving:

  • Pharmaceuticals with inadequate warnings about side effects
  • Industrial chemicals without proper hazard communications
  • Medical devices with insufficient risk information
  • Power tools lacking adequate safety instructions
  • Recreational equipment without proper use guidelines
  • Consumer products with hidden dangers not addressed in warnings
  • Children’s products with inadequate parental warnings
  • Machinery with insufficient operator warnings
  • Products with warnings that don’t comply with California Proposition 65
  • Automotive features with inadequate operational warnings
  • Products marketed for uses that create undisclosed dangers
  • Technical products with complex risks not adequately explained

Our attorneys work with human factors experts, warnings specialists, and industry-specific professionals to establish what warnings would have been adequate and how proper warnings would have prevented injury. We analyze industry standards for warnings, including ANSI Z535 standards, ISO guidelines, and regulatory requirements for specific product categories.

For pharmaceutical cases, we thoroughly examine the evolution of warning labels, physician package inserts, and direct-to-consumer advertising to identify inadequate risk disclosures. We understand the FDA’s role in label approval and the pharmaceutical industry’s responsibility to update warnings when new risks emerge.

California Product Liability Legal Framework

California’s product liability laws offer several advantages to injured consumers:

Strict Liability Standard

Unlike ordinary negligence claims, California’s strict liability standard for product liability means plaintiffs don’t need to prove the manufacturer was negligent or careless. Instead, they must establish:

  1. The defendant designed, manufactured, distributed, or sold the product
  2. The product contained a defect when it left the defendant’s possession
  3. The defect caused harm during reasonably foreseeable use
  4. The plaintiff suffered damages as a result

This consumer-friendly standard recognizes that manufacturers are in the best position to ensure product safety and should bear responsibility when their products cause harm.

California law allows product liability claims against multiple parties in the distribution chain, including:

  • Product designers and engineers
  • Component part manufacturers
  • Final product manufacturers
  • Distributors and wholesalers
  • Retailers who sold the product
  • Companies that installed or maintained the product

This expansive approach ensures injured consumers can seek recovery even when the primary manufacturer is foreign, insolvent, or difficult to pursue. Our firm identifies all potentially liable parties in the distribution chain to maximize recovery options.

California applies pure comparative fault principles in product liability cases. This means that even if you were partially responsible for your injury, you can still recover damages, though your recovery may be reduced by your percentage of fault. Even in cases where the consumer misused the product, recovery may be possible if the misuse was reasonably foreseeable by the manufacturer.

Product liability claims in California generally must be filed within two years of the date of injury. However, the discovery rule may extend this period if the connection between the product and injury wasn’t immediately apparent. For latent injuries that develop over time, the clock may not start running until you discover or reasonably should have discovered that the product caused your harm.

California does not have a general statute of repose for product liability claims, which is beneficial to consumers injured by older products. However, specific products like aircraft have special limitations periods.

Our Product Liability Approach

Schneiderman Trial Attorneys brings significant technical and legal resources to product liability cases:

Technical Investigation

Our product liability cases begin with thorough technical investigation:

  • Preservation of the defective product and all relevant evidence
  • Detailed documentation of the product condition and failure mode
  • Collaboration with qualified experts in relevant technical fields
  • Laboratory testing and failure analysis
  • Exemplar testing of similar products
  • Review of applicable industry standards and regulations
  • Analysis of similar incidents and product failures
  • Review of patent documents revealing known design alternatives
  • Evaluation of testing performed by the manufacturer
  • Documentation of design evolution and safety improvements

Product liability cases require aggressive discovery to obtain critical corporate documents:

  • Internal testing records and failed test results
  • Design history and safety engineering documents
  • Risk assessments and hazard analyses
  • Customer complaints and warranty claims
  • Prior incidents and accident reports
  • Internal correspondence about safety concerns
  • Regulatory submissions and communications
  • Manufacturing quality control records
  • Marketing materials and advertising claims
  • Cost-benefit analyses of safety features
  • Corporate safety policies and procedures
  • Expert witness depositions

Our legal team understands how to navigate complex electronic discovery issues in corporate environments, including how to identify and request relevant electronically stored information while fighting against inappropriate confidentiality designations.

Product defect injuries often involve complex medical causation issues. Our firm works with qualified medical experts to establish the connection between the product defect and your specific injuries. We develop comprehensive damages presentations that account for:

  • All related medical expenses, current and future
  • Lost income and diminished earning capacity
  • Rehabilitation and adaptive equipment needs
  • Necessary home and vehicle modifications
  • Pain and suffering from injuries
  • Emotional distress and psychological trauma
  • Loss of enjoyment of life
  • Potential punitive damages in cases of egregious conduct

Our product liability litigation strategy is built on:

  • Early identification of technical and legal issues
  • Strategic expert selection and development
  • Anticipation of defense strategies and counterarguments
  • Preparation for complex causation challenges
  • Development of compelling demonstrative evidence
  • Readiness for battle-of-experts scenarios
  • Thorough jury education on technical concepts
  • Strategic use of pretrial motions

While prepared for trial, we recognize that many product liability cases resolve through settlement. Our firm creates settlement leverage through:

  • Thorough case preparation demonstrating trial readiness
  • Compelling demand packages with clear liability and damages presentation
  • Strategic use of mediation and settlement conferences
  • Understanding of how similar cases have resolved
  • Knowledge of how insurance and risk management operates in corporate settings
  • Willingness to pursue litigation through trial when necessary
Types of Products in Our Practice

Schneiderman Trial Attorneys handles product liability cases involving virtually any consumer or industrial product that causes injury, including:

Automotive Defects
  • Defective airbags and restraint systems
  • Vehicle stability and rollover issues
  • Brake and acceleration system failures
  • Fuel system design defects
  • Tire failures and defects
  • Seatback failures
  • Door latch and ejection issues
  • Vehicle crashworthiness problems
  • Electronic and software defects
  • Heavy truck and commercial vehicle defects
  • Implantable medical devices
  • Surgical tools and equipment
  • Orthopedic implants
  • Birth control devices
  • Diagnostic equipment
  • Monitoring devices
  • Infusion pumps and delivery systems
  • Prosthetic devices
  • Surgical mesh products
  • Dental devices and materials
  • Prescription medications with undisclosed side effects
  • Over-the-counter drugs with safety issues
  • Compounded pharmaceuticals
  • Biologics and vaccines
  • Generic drug issues
  • Combination drug products
  • Pharmaceutical packaging defects
  • Drug-device combination products
  • Household appliances
  • Children’s products and toys
  • Power tools and lawn equipment
  • Recreational equipment
  • Furniture and household goods
  • Electronic devices
  • Personal care products
  • Food products
  • Clothing and protective gear
  • Exercise equipment
  • Industrial machinery
  • Construction equipment
  • Material handling equipment
  • Manufacturing tools and devices
  • Safety equipment and protective gear
  • Workplace vehicles and transport systems
  • Power generation equipment
  • Agricultural equipment and machinery
  • Mining equipment
  • Electrical systems and components
Why Choose Schneiderman Trial Attorneys for Product Liability Cases
Technical Expertise

Product liability cases demand technical understanding that general personal injury firms often lack. Our legal team brings expertise and knowledge to product cases:

  • Engineering background among our legal team
  • Deep understanding of manufacturing processes
  • Ability to read and interpret technical documents
  • Knowledge of relevant standards and regulations
  • Experience with technical expert witnesses
  • Understanding of technical testing protocols
  • Ability to translate complex concepts for juries

Product liability litigation against major manufacturers requires significant resources. Schneiderman Trial Attorneys commits the necessary resources to level the playing field:

  • Funding for comprehensive expert analysis
  • Resources for product testing and analysis
  • Advanced demonstrative evidence development
  • Staffing for document-intensive discovery
  • Technology for managing complex evidence
  • Court reporting for critical depositions
  • Trial presentation technology and support

Our attorneys have successfully taken on some of the world’s largest manufacturers across multiple industries. We understand corporate defense strategies and how to overcome them:

  • Knowledge of manufacturer litigation playbooks
  • Experience with corporate representative depositions
  • Understanding of corporate document systems
  • Familiarity with common defense experts
  • Experience countering causation challenges
  • Strategy for addressing federal preemption defenses
  • Approach to combating misuse and modification defenses

For products that have caused widespread harm, our attorneys participate in coordinated proceedings and multi-district litigation (MDL). We understand how to leverage the collective knowledge of these proceedings while maintaining focus on your individual case and specific damages.

Product Liability FAQs
How do I know if my injury was caused by a defective product?

Some indicators include the product malfunctioning or breaking during normal use, injuries despite following all instructions, similar reported problems with the same product, or recalls for the product. Our technical experts can examine the product and your circumstances to determine if a defect caused your injury.

It’s crucial to preserve the product in its post-incident condition. Don’t alter, repair, or return it, as the physical evidence is often critical to your case. If possible, retain all packaging, instructions, receipts, and related materials. Contact us immediately for guidance on proper preservation.

Absolutely. Many dangerous products are never recalled, and recalls often happen only after numerous injuries. The absence of a recall does not prevent you from pursuing a product liability claim if the product was defective and caused your injury.

While helpful, a receipt is not always necessary. We can often establish your purchase or use of the product through credit card statements, photographs, witness statements, registration records, warranty information, or other means. Don’t assume lack of a receipt prevents your claim.

Generally, California requires product liability lawsuits to be filed within two years of the date of injury. However, this can be extended in cases where the connection between the product and injury wasn’t immediately apparent. Contact us promptly for an evaluation of your specific timeline.

Contact Schneiderman Trial Attorneys Today

GET STARTED WITH SCHNEIDERMAN Trial Attorneys

Reach out to
Schneiderman Trial Attorneys
Today to Learn More

If you've been injured by a defective product in California, Schneiderman Trial Attorneys provides the technical expertise and litigation resources needed to take on major manufacturers and win. Contact us for a free, confidential consultation.

SCHEDULE YOUR FREE CASE REVIEW